6 Easy Ways to Offend the Over-Offendable

Laissez Faire Today
May 5, 2016

How to Be Politically Incorrect

A Young Woman on Her Way to Lunch… (What Happens Next Is UNBELIEVABLE)

She was on her way to lunch… Walking down the street in plain daylight.

And then… THIS happened.

If you do one thing today, please take a look at thisoutrageous video. It’s unlike anything you’ve ever seen.

--If you’re worried that the politically-correct Social Justice Warriors will destroy this country — don’t be.

We predict they will destroy themselves long before they have any shot at performing their crybully coup d’etat. (Why, with Hillary Clinton as their latest victim, they’ve already begun to eat their own.)

Millions upon millions of words flood out of America’s most prestigious colleges each year about the patriarchal, sexist, racist America we live in. America is the land where everyone can be a victim (except, of course, cis-gendered males), until proven empowered.

Yet, it never occurs to the precious snowflakes of America that being able to complain about the current social structure is a privilege in itself. Not every citizen of the world is so lucky.

Sure, America has its problems. But if Saudi feminists, for example, had the freedom to take a nice leisurely “SlutWalk” down a busy metropolitan city street with their breasts exposed, they wouldn’t have to worry about getting beheaded for merely holding a sign in the air demanding equal rights.

American privilege? Absolutely.

But, of course, we suspect that the average SJW hasn’t ventured too far outside of the soft and cushy borders of the Land of the Free. (Or mother’s basement, for that matter.)

If they did, they’d truly understand how low and depraved poverty can reach. They’d understand that, in the grand scheme of things, the world can be a merciless, unrelentingly miserable place. And safe spaces are a luxury. One that the vast majority of the world, unfortunately, cannot afford.

But that’s neither here nor there. Our colleges are clearly filled with lively debates and hard thinking.

For example, the argument over who can use what potty — the flavor of the week for many campuses — is certainly more relevant than the impending global economic collapse caused by a bunch of nutcases who think our monetary regime is “helping.”

And outrage over poop swastikas drawn by sickos in university toilet stalls is certainly a better contribution than outrage over blood running thick in Syrian streets.

The SJW logic comes down this: If it doesn’t fall in line with the “critical theory” paradigm (see: cultural Marxism), the neurons begin to twitch — in part fear and part rage.

For those who refuse to sip the Kool-Aid, challenging the SJW’s fixed ideas can be a nerve-wracking experience. I mean, who wants to accidentally violate a safe space and “trigger” a coddled cascade of imaginary fits of spontaneous combustion?

(Don’t answer that.)

There’s no need for anyone, if we are to follow this logic, to feel any sense of responsibility for their own emotions and actions. How we react to words is the fault of the person who speaks (or writes) them. And those who cannot handle certain strings of letters need protection (armed, if necessary) from all the people who speak them.

Uhhh… are we getting that right?

Comedian John Cleese, in a recent Big Think video, sums it up neatly:

“The idea that you should be protected from any uncomfortable emotion,” he says, “is one I absolutely do not subscribe to.

“A fellow that I helped write two books about psychology and psychiatry, he was a renowned psychiatrist in London called Robert Skinner. He said something very interesting to me.

“He said: ‘If people can’t control their own emotions, then they have to start trying to control other people’s behavior. And when you’re around super-sensitive people you cannot relax and be spontaneous because you have no idea what’s going to upset them next.’

John Cleese

“And that’s why,” Cleese went on, “I’ve been warned recently don’t go to most university campuses because the political correctness has been taken from being a good idea, which is let’s not be mean particularly to people who are not able to look after themselves very well… to the point where any kind of criticism, any individual or group can be labeled cruel.”

John Cleese Gif

Not animated? Click here.

--And with that, we’re going to pass the mic off to Jeff Deist, President of the Mises Institute, to talk about what political correctness really is, and what we can do to fight against it.

Don’t worry. It doesn’t involve holding a “Make America Great Again” sign on the side of the road.

Read on…

WARNING: 11-Second Video Clip Not for the Faint of Heart

Warning!People call this kind of video NSFW, or Not Safe For Work.

Let’s be upfront — this video contains sexual content.

It’s not graphic. But it is suggestive.

If you’re gutsy, click below and watch it right now. There’s a huge potential payoff for you.

That’s because the video is behind the origin of what could turn into a $30 billion-a-year industry.

Warning — click here to watch this NSFW 11-second video only if you’re NOT easily offended.

PC is About Control, Not Etiquette

By Jeff Deist

I’d like to speak today about what political correctness is, at least in its modern version, what it is not, and what we might do to fight against it.

To begin, we need to understand that political correctness is not about being nice. It’s not simply a social issue, or a subset of the culture wars.

It’s not about politeness, or inclusiveness, or good manners. It’s not about being respectful toward your fellow humans, and it’s not about being sensitive or caring or avoiding hurt feelings and unpleasant slurs.

But you’ve heard this argument, I’m sure. PC is about simple respect and inclusiveness, they tell us. As though we need progressives, the cultural enforcers, to help us understand that we shouldn’t call someone retarded, or use the “N” word, make hurtful comments about someone’s appearance, or tolerate bullies.

If PC truly was about kindness and respect, it wouldn’t need to be imposed on us. After all, we already have a mechanism for the social cohesion PC is said to represent: it’s called manners. And we already have specific individuals charged with insuring that good manners are instilled and upheld: they’re called parents.

Political Correctness Defined

But what exactly is PC? Let me take a stab at defining it: Political correctness is the conscious, designed manipulation of language intended to change the way people speak, write, think, feel, and act, in furtherance of an agenda.

PC is best understood as propaganda, which is how I suggest we approach it. But unlike propaganda, which historically has been used by governments to win favor for a particular campaign or effort, PC is all-encompassing. It seeks nothing less than to mold us into modern versions of Marx’s un-alienated society man, freed of all his bourgeois pretensions and humdrum social conventions.

Like all propaganda, PC fundamentally is a lie. It is about refusing to deal with the underlying nature of reality, in fact attempting to alter that reality by legislative and social fiat. A is no longer A.

To quote Hans-Hermann Hoppe:

[T]he masters … stipulate that aggression, invasion, murder and war are actually self-defense, whereas self-defense is aggression, invasion, murder and war. Freedom is coercion, and coercion is freedom. … Taxes are voluntary payments, and voluntarily paid prices are exploitative taxes. In a PC world, metaphysics is diverted and rerouted. Truth becomes malleable, to serve a bigger purpose determined by our superiors.

But where did all this come from? Surely PC, in all its various forms, is nothing new under the sun. I think we can safely assume that feudal chiefs, kings, emperors, and politicians have ever and always attempted to control the various forms, is nothing new under the sun. I think we can safely assume that feudal chiefs, kings, emperors, and politicians have ever and always attempted to control the language, thoughts, and thus the actions of their subjects. Thought police have always existed.

To understand the origins of political correctness, we might look to the aforementioned Marx, and later the Frankfurt school. We might consider the work of Leo Strauss for its impact on the war-hungry think tank world. We might study the deceptive sloganeering of Saul Alinsky. We might mention the French philosopher Foucault, who used the term “political correctness” in the 1960s as a criticism of unscientific dogma.

But if you really want to understand the black art of PC propaganda, let me suggest reading one of its foremost practitioners, Edward Bernays.

Bernays was a remarkable man, someone who literally wrote the book on propaganda and its softer guise of public relations. He is little discussed in the West today, despite being the godfather of modern spin.

He was the nephew of Sigmund Freud, and like Mises was born in Austria in the late nineteenth century. Unlike Mises, however, he fortuitously came to New York City as an infant and then proceeded to live an astonishing 103 years.

One of his first jobs was as a press agent for President Woodrow Wilson’s Committee on Public Information, an agency designed to gin up popular support for US entry into WW1 (German Americans and Irish Americans especially were opposed). It was Bernays who coined the infamous phrase “Make the World Safe for Democracy” used by the committee.

After the war, he asked himself whether one could “apply a similar technique to the problems of peace.” And by “problems,” Bernays meant selling stuff. He directed very successful campaigns promoting Ivory Soap, for bacon and eggs as a healthy breakfast, and ballet. He directed several very successful advertising campaigns, most notably for Lucky Strike in its efforts to make smoking socially acceptable for women.

The Role of “Herd Psychology”

Bernays was quite open and even proud of engaging in the “manufacturing of consent,” a term used by British surgeon and psychologist Wilfred Trotter in his seminal Instincts of the Herd in Peace and Warpublished in 1919.

Bernays took the concept of herd psychology to heart. The herd instinct entails the deep seated psychological need to win approval of one’s social group. The herd overwhelms any other influence; as social humans, our need to fit in is paramount.

But however ingrained, in Bernays’ view the herd instinct cannot be trusted. The herd is irrational and dangerous, and must be steered by wiser men in a thousand imperceptible ways — and this is key. They must not know they are being steered.

The techniques Bernays employed are still very much being used to shape political correctness today.

First, he understood how all-powerful the herd mind and herd instinct really is. We are not the special snowflakes we imagine, according to Bernays. Instead we are timorous and malleable creatures who desperately want to fit in and win acceptance of the group.

Second, he understood the critical importance of using third party authorities to promote causes or products. Celebrities, athletes, models, politicians, and wealthy elites are the people from whom the herd takes its cues, whether they’re endorsing transgender awareness or selling luxury cars. So when George Clooney or Kim Kardashian endorses Hillary Clinton, it resonates with the herd.

Third, he understood the role that emotions play in our tastes and preferences. It’s not a particular candidate or cigarette or a watch or a handbag we really want, it’s the emotional component of the ad that affects us, however subconsciously.

What We Can Do About It

So the question we might ask ourselves is this: how do we fight back against PC? What can we do, as individuals with finite amounts of time and resources, with serious obligations to our families, loved ones, and careers, to reverse the growing tide of darkness?

First, we must understand that we’re in a fight. PC represents a war for our very hearts, minds, and souls. The other side understands this, and so should you. The fight is taking place on multiple fronts: the state-linguistic complex operates not only within government, but also academia, media, the business world, churches and synagogues, nonprofits, and NGOs. So understand the forces aligned against you.

Understand that the PC enforcers are not asking you, they’re not debating you, and they don’t care about your vote. They don’t care whether they can win at the ballot box, or whether they use extralegal means. There are millions of progressives in the US who absolutely would criminalize speech that does not comport with their sense of social justice.

One poll suggests 51 percent of Democrats and 1/3 of all Americans would do just that.

The other side is fighting deliberately and tactically. So realize you’re in a fight, and fight back. Culturally, this really is a matter of life and death.

SHOCKING: Banned From the Bible

More than 1,700 years ago, an Egyptian religious leader outlawed a sacred text said to contain teachings Jesus gave to one of his apostles.

Fearing it would be destroyed, an early Christian sect buried it in the desert. After all those years, those teachings from the Son of God have finally resurfaced.

And they’re creating a firestorm of controversy in the medical community.

If you are an atheist… you may find yourself at a loss to explain this astonishing revelation. Click here and see it for yourself.

We Still Have Freedom to Act

As bad as PC contamination may be at this point, we are not like Mises, fleeing a few days ahead of the Nazis. We have tremendous resources at our disposal in a digital age. We can still communicate globally and create communities of outspoken, anti-PC voices.

We can still read and share anti-state books and articles. We can still read real history and the great un-PC literary classics. We can still homeschool our kids. We can still hold events like this one today.

This is not to say that bucking PC can’t hurt you: the possible loss of one’s job, reputation, friends, and even family is very serious. But defeatism is never called for, and it makes us unworthy of our ancestors.

Use humor to ridicule PC. PC is absurd, and most people sense it. And its practitioners suffer from a comical lack of self-awareness and irony. Use every tool at your disposal to mock, ridicule, and expose PC for what it is.

Never forget that society can change very rapidly in the wake of certain precipitating events. We certainly all hope that no great calamity strikes America, in the form of an economic collapse, a currency collapse, an inability to provide entitlements and welfare, energy shortages, food and water shortages, natural disasters, or civil unrest. But we can’t discount the possibility of these things happening.

And if they do, I suggest that PC language and PC thinking will be the first ornament of the state to go. Only rich, modern, societies can afford the luxury of a mindset that does not comport with reality, and that mindset will be swiftly swept aside as the “rich” part of America frays.

Men and women might start to rediscover that they need and complement each other if the welfare state breaks down. Endless hours spent on social media might give way to rebuilding social connections that really matter when the chips are down.

More traditional family structures might suddenly seem less oppressive in the face of great economic uncertainty. Schools and universities might rediscover the value of teaching practical skills, instead of whitewashed history and grievance studies. One’s sexual preferences might not loom as large in the scheme of things, certainly not as a source of rights. The rule of law might become something more than an abstraction to be discarded in order to further social justice and deny privilege.

Play the Long Game

I’m afraid it might not be popular to say so, but we have to be prepared for a long and hard campaign. Let’s leave the empty promises of quick fixes to the politicians. Progressives play the long game masterfully. They’ve taken 100 years to ransack our institutions inch by inch. I’m not suggesting incrementalism to reclaim those foregone institutions, which are by all account too far gone — but to create our own.

PC enforcers seek to divide and atomize us, by class, race, sex, and sexuality. So let’s take them up on it. Let’s bypass the institutions controlled by them in favor of our own. Who says we can’t create our own schools, our own churches, our own media, our own literature, and our own civic and social organizations? Starting from scratch certainly is less daunting than fighting PC on its own turf.


PC is a virus that puts us — liberty loving people — on our heels. When we allow progressives to frame the debate and control the narrative, we lose power over our lives. If we don’t address what the state and its agents are doing to control us, we might honestly wonder how much longer organizations like the Mises Institute are going to be free to hold events like this one today.

Is it really that unimaginable that you might wake up one day and find sites with anti-state and anti-egalitarian content blocked — sites like mises.organd lewrockwell.com?

Or that social media outlets like Facebook might simply eliminate opinions not deemed acceptable in the new America?

In fact, head Facebook creep Mark Zuckerberg recently was overheard at a UN summit telling Angela Merkel that he would get to work on suppressing Facebook comments by Germans who have the audacity to object to the government’s handling of migrants.

Here’s the Facebook statement:

We are committed to working closely with the German government on this important issue. We think the best solutions to dealing with people who make racist and xenophobic comments can be found when service providers, government, and civil society all work together to address this common challenge.

Chilling, isn’t it? And coming soon to a server near you, unless we all get busy.

[Ed. note: This article appears in the November–December 2015 issue of The Austrian.]


Jeff Deist
President, Mises Institute

Laissez Faire Family
Laissez Faire Today Is Just One Small Part of Laissez Faire’s Comprehensive Suite of Offerings…

Laissez Faire Today is your daily free e-letter that explores current events and topics related to freedom, self-reliance and independent action. But that’s not all we have to offer! There are several other paid subscription newsletters available to choose from. This includes our flagship Laissez Faire Letter,which gives you actionable tips from our expert contributors on how to live a healthier, wealthier and self-reliant life. Click here today to learn more about our other newsletters, which range in topic from alternative health solutions to securing a better retirement!

View All Laissez Faire’s Offerings
Log In
Forgot username or password?
View Archives
View All Publications
Get Help
Laissez Faire BooksTo end your Laissez Faire Today e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Laissez Faire Today,click here to unsubscribe.

If you are you having trouble receiving your Laissez Faire Todaysubscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by whitelistingLaissez Faire Today.

Laissez Faire Today is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. By submitting your email address, you consent to Agora Financial delivering daily email issues and advertisements. Please read our Privacy Statement.

© 2016 Laissez Faire Books, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. Nothing in this e-mail should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

About Looking Back Woman-Suzanne Dupree

Tetuwan Lakota scholar, educator, historian, Sun Dance participant, Cannunpa carrier, cultural & spiritual preservationist, journalist-writer and fraud investigator.
This entry was posted in SPIRITUAL AWAKENING. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to I have being POLITICALLY INCORRECT down to a SCIENCE!

  1. No one is going to stop me in any way from telling it like it IS!
    Guess most folks who read my blog, seen or unseen know this fact!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Pingback: Making my position very clear…to everyone. | Looking Back Woman-Suzanne Dupree blog

Comments are closed.