Arlo Looking Cloud should be free, conflict of interest collusion by legal council!


Arlo Looking Cloud shows conflict of interest by Rapid City Attorney & Supreme Court Judge of South Dakota, Charles Abourezk

1 Vote

U.S. and who?  submits motion to dismiss Amended Section 2255

ALC and lawyer, response

-summary of 1st paragraph:
1) -doctrine of equitable tolling should be applied
why?  -because Defendent’s Amended Sec. 2255 is timely

2) -Defendent submits there are ample facts to support
claims made by D. in the Amendment

—————————————————————————————-

Summary of Position taken in all Affidavits by ALC:

QUOTE

1.   As will be demonstrated below, Defendent expects that the 3 depositions that he seeks to
take, and to which the U.S. has no opposition, will shed further light on his arguments as
to why this matter should not be dismissed

2.  If this Court dismisses the Amended Section 2255 motion, which Defendent submits that it
should not do, Defendent requests that the Court provide him and his counsel adequate time
to file a motion with this Court to recommend an appropriate placement for Defendant in light
of his current circumstances.

—————————————————————————————–

Arguments for;  “This court should apply the doctrine of equitable tolling to hold that the
amended claims are timely”

A)  Defendent has pursued his rights diligently
(my words, now I understand… here is Sec. 2255 that was initially filed)

-initial section 2255 was filed after discovering his lawyer (attorney Teri Gilbert) was
close friends and legal counsel to Vernon Bellecourt  (ALC had to kick the bum out – was
this the guy who represented him at his trial?)

-new attorney Michael Butler retained, but dismissed because the guy never talked to
him or got back to him (sound familiar?)

-Feb. 2008, Barry Bachrach appointed, ALC expressed interest in co-operating with
government, something previous attorneys had advised him against!

-Aug. 2008 – ALC talks to Attorney Marty Jackley for the U.S. (prosecuting attorney)
provides substantial assistance

-2008 to June 2011 – Defendant’s attorneys, Monica Colbath and B. Bachrach, work with
defendant “providing substantial assistance to authorities in connection with the murder
of Ms. Anna Mae Aquash”

July 14, 2011, U.S. Rule 35 Motion was applied due to D’s “Substantial Co-operation”, and his
sentence was reduced to 20 years from life…

———————————————————————————————-

Arguments for;  “Extraordinairy Circumstances Prevented Defendant from Raising The Claims
Asserted in the Amended Petition”

“The crux of Def.’s Amended Section 2255 motion is that Attorney Rensch, individually and
in concert with others, provided ineffective assistance of counsel by protecting the interests of
others over the interests of Defendant.  Defendant sets forth several circumstances where this
manifested itself.

1.  Attorney Rensch refused to interview Attorney Bruce Ellison or call him as a witness,
despite Attorney Ellison’s attorney (oi vay – an attorney for an attorney!?), Jim Leach,
encouraging Rensch to do so (exhibit b)

2.  Vernon Bellecourt, sought and apparently had control over who would represent the
Defendant, and had an impact on who did (exhibit c)

3.  according to Defendant, he fired attorney Terri Gilbert upon learning of his close relation-
ship with Vernon Bellecourt;  a relationship that Defendant was unaware of when he
initially retained Gilbert (exhibit d)

4.  Defendant just recently discovered evidence that, unknown to him, Attorney Charles
     Abourezk acted as what Abourezk described as “an ex parte trial counsel to Att. Rensch”
     despite the fact that Abourezk admittedly represented “3 of the witnesses in this matter”
     (exhibit e)

5.  Defendant testified that Attorney Abourezk was not only present at Bill Means’ residence on
     Rosebud Reservation when John Graham, Theda Nelson Clark, and Defendant stopped
     there shortly before Ms. Aquash was murdered, but also that Charles Abourezk let
    Defendant into the house to use the restroom.  As such, Attorney Abourezk should not  
    have represented Defendant in any capacity because he represented 3 other trial witnesses
    and was also placed at an important scene along the route to Ms. Aquash’ murder.

6.  Attorney Rensch submitted Defendant to a so called “psycho-drama”, the purpose of which
     Defendant has never understood. 

     In doing so, Attorney Rensch had Attorney Charles Abourezk and another member of the
     Abourezk Law Firm, Robin Zephier, participate in the psycho-drama. 

     The Abourezk Law Firm was representing “3 witnesses at the time”

     According to Defendant, they had him retell what occurred, but for what purpose he did
     not know

—————————————————————————————————————–

Talk about techniques of control!

——————————————————————————————————————-

-Bachrach summarizes:

– Putting aside the allegedly nefarious purpose of the so-called “psycho-drama” in light of Attorney
Abourezk’s representing 3 witnesses (my words – I’d like to know who the 3 witnesses were –
Richard 2 Elk was probably one of them, but I don’t know yet.)

– And Charles Abourzeks presence at a key spot along the trail to Ms. Aquash’ murder, Defendant never knew that
Attorney Abourezk was representing him or had any involvement in his defense, (exhibits e – f)

-This was only discovered and brought to Defendant’s (Looking Cloud) attention after the Amendment was filed
while his current counsel continued preparing for the hearing on his Section 2255 motion

-Attorney Charles Abourezk’s involvement in Defendant’s case is particularly troubling because Att. Rensch
neither told Defendant nor sought his permission to have Att. Charles Abourezk represent him as an
“ex parte trial attorney”  (my words, I think that means he was working as a consultant, not
immediately apparent to ALC, but there with legal advice and control none the less)

Defendant would have objected to any such representation given the obvious conflicts of interest
of Charles Abourzeks in representing Arlo Looking Cloud.
—————————————————————————————————–

Bachrach continues:

-based on current info., it is unclear if Att.s Abourezk and Zephier were also representing Defendant
during the psycho-drama, or what role they played

-the Defendant’s file contains no documents referencing the “psycho-drama”

-yet according to Defendant, the “psycho-drama” was one of the few times that Attorney Rensch substantively
interacted with him.

-more importantly, he did so while in the presence of Att.s Abourezk and Zephier, as well as his associate
and secretary…

—————————————————————————————————————————

This is incredible…

—————————————————————————————————————————-

Defendant, since he can’t determine their role or why they did
what they did in this psycho-drama, and since there are no Docs.
on the incident, the Defendant requests through depositions from
Att’s Abourezk and Zephier, their role and purposes in this process
that occurred

-it is essential that the court permit the Defendant to learn the role Attorney Abourezk
had in his defense

-The United States must not object to the Defendant conducting these depositions either
(my words…… you go guys, you go!)

About these ads

Occasionally, some of your visitors may see an advertisement here
You can hide these ads completely by upgrading to one of our paid plans.

UPGRADE NOW DISMISS MESSAGE

About Looking Back Woman-Suzanne Dupree

Tetuwan Lakota scholar, educator, historian, Sun Dance participant, Cannunpa carrier, cultural & spiritual preservationist, journalist-writer and fraud investigator.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Edit

7 Responses to Arlo Looking Cloud shows conflict of interest by Rapid City Attorney & Supreme Court Judge of South Dakota, Charles Abourezk

  1. 0
    0
    Rate This

    AIM & the Abourezks let Arlo Looking Cloud take the rap for Anna Maes murder, when they all were KNEE deep in collusion, conspiracy to commit murder, & conflict of interest…ya think….
    Lets get the BIG Boyz who perpetrated & profited from Anna Maes murder & who have done everything to prevent the truth about the roles each man played in her murder from being held accountable, & facing their responsibility of being accessories to murder, as well as conspiracy to commit murder…
    No wonder no one other than Peltier has spent much time behind bars…
    when you got the whole US government & the State of South Dakota covering up AIMs crimes, along with Judge Nichol, Senator Abourezk, and his son…Charlie!
    U.S. and who? submits motion to dismiss Amended Section 2255

    ALC and lawyer, response

    -summary of 1st paragraph:
    1) -doctrine of equitable tolling should be applied
    why? -because Defendent’s Amended Sec. 2255 is timely

    2) -Defendent submits there are ample facts to support
    claims made by D. in the Amendment

    —————————————————————————————-

    Summary of Position taken in all Affidavits by ALC:

    QUOTE

    1. As will be demonstrated below, Defendent expects that the 3 depositions that he seeks to
    take, and to which the U.S. has no opposition, will shed further light on his arguments as
    to why this matter should not be dismissed

    2. If this Court dismisses the Amended Section 2255 motion, which Defendent submits that it
    should not do, Defendent requests that the Court provide him and his counsel adequate time
    to file a motion with this Court to recommend an appropriate placement for Defendant in light
    of his current circumstances.

    —————————————————————————————–

    Arguments for; “This court should apply the doctrine of equitable tolling to hold that the
    amended claims are timely”

    A) Defendent has pursued his rights diligently
    (my words, now I understand… here is Sec. 2255 that was initially filed)

    -initial section 2255 was filed after discovering his lawyer (attorney Teri Gilbert) was
    close friends and legal counsel to Vernon Bellecourt (ALC had to kick the bum out – was
    this the guy who represented him at his trial?)

    -new attorney Michael Butler retained, but dismissed because the guy never talked to
    him or got back to him (sound familiar?)

    -Feb. 2008, Barry Bachrach appointed, ALC expressed interest in co-operating with
    government, something previous attorneys had advised him against!

    -Aug. 2008 – ALC talks to Attorney Marty Jackley for the U.S. (prosecuting attorney)
    provides substantial assistance

    -2008 to June 2011 – Defendant’s attorneys, Monica Colbath and B. Bachrach, work with
    defendant “providing substantial assistance to authorities in connection with the murder
    of Ms. Anna Mae Aquash”

    July 14, 2011, U.S. Rule 35 Motion was applied due to D’s “Substantial Co-operation”, and his
    sentence was reduced to 20 years from life…

    ———————————————————————————————-

    Arguments for; “Extraordinairy Circumstances Prevented Defendant from Raising The Claims
    Asserted in the Amended Petition”

    “The crux of Def.’s Amended Section 2255 motion is that Attorney Rensch, individually and
    in concert with others, provided ineffective assistance of counsel by protecting the interests of
    others over the interests of Defendant. Defendant sets forth several circumstances where this
    manifested itself.

    1. Attorney Rensch refused to interview Attorney Bruce Ellison or call him as a witness,
    despite Attorney Ellison’s attorney (oi vay – an attorney for an attorney!?), Jim Leach,
    encouraging Rensch to do so (exhibit b)

    2. Vernon Bellecourt, sought and apparently had control over who would represent the
    Defendant, and had an impact on who did (exhibit c)

    3. according to Defendant, he fired attorney Terri Gilbert upon learning of his close relation-
    ship with Vernon Bellecourt; a relationship that Defendant was unaware of when he
    initially retained Gilbert (exhibit d)

    4. Defendant just recently discovered evidence that, unknown to him, Attorney Charles
    Abourezk acted as what Abourezk described as “an ex parte trial counsel to Att. Rensch”
    despite the fact that Abourezk admittedly represented “3 of the witnesses in this matter”
    (exhibit e)

    5. Defendant testified that Attorney Abourezk was not only present at Bill Means’ residence on
    Rosebud Reservation when John Graham, Theda Nelson Clark, and Defendant stopped
    there shortly before Ms. Aquash was murdered, but also that Charles Abourezk let
    Defendant into the house to use the restroom. As such, Attorney Abourezk should not
    have represented Defendant in any capacity because he represented 3 other trial witnesses
    and was also placed at an important scene along the route to Ms. Aquash’ murder.

    6. Attorney Rensch submitted Defendant to a so called “psycho-drama”, the purpose of which
    Defendant has never understood.

    In doing so, Attorney Rensch had Attorney Charles Abourezk and another member of the
    Abourezk Law Firm, Robin Zephier, participate in the psycho-drama.

    The Abourezk Law Firm was representing “3 witnesses at the time”

    According to Defendant, they had him retell what occurred, but for what purpose he did
    not know

    —————————————————————————————————————–

    Talk about techniques of control!

    ——————————————————————————————————————-

    -Bachrach summarizes:

    – Putting aside the allegedly nefarious purpose of the so-called “psycho-drama” in light of Attorney
    Abourezk’s representing 3 witnesses (my words – I’d like to know who the 3 witnesses were –
    Richard 2 Elk was probably one of them, but I don’t know yet.)

    – And Charles Abourzeks presence at a key spot along the trail to Ms. Aquash’ murder, Defendant never knew that
    Attorney Abourezk was representing him or had any involvement in his defense, (exhibits e – f)

    -This was only discovered and brought to Defendant’s (Looking Cloud) attention after the Amendment was filed
    while his current counsel continued preparing for the hearing on his Section 2255 motion

    -Attorney Charles Abourezk’s involvement in Defendant’s case is particularly troubling because Att. Rensch
    neither told Defendant nor sought his permission to have Att. Charles Abourezk represent him as an
    “ex parte trial attorney” (my words, I think that means he was working as a consultant, not
    immediately apparent to ALC, but there with legal advice and control none the less)

    -Defendant would have objected to any such representation given the obvious conflicts of interest
    of Charles Abourzeks in representing Arlo Looking Cloud.
    —————————————————————————————————–

    Bachrach continues:

    -based on current info., it is unclear if Att.s Abourezk and Zephier were also representing Defendant
    during the psycho-drama, or what role they played

    -the Defendant’s file contains no documents referencing the “psycho-drama”

    -yet according to Defendant, the “psycho-drama” was one of the few times that Attorney Rensch substantively
    interacted with him.

    -more importantly, he did so while in the presence of Att.s Abourezk and Zephier, as well as his associate
    and secretary…

    —————————————————————————————————————————

    This is incredible…

    —————————————————————————————————————————-

    Defendant, since he can’t determine their role or why they did
    what they did in this psycho-drama, and since there are no Docs.
    on the incident, the Defendant requests through depositions from
    Att’s Abourezk and Zephier, their role and purposes in this process
    that occurred

    -it is essential that the court permit the Defendant to learn the role Attorney Abourezk
    had in his defense

    -the United States must not object to the Defendant conducting these depositions either
    (my words…… you go guys, you go!)

    Like

  2. 0
    0
    Rate This

    This was soooo good, & so informative I just had to repeat the info!
    WA’CHOKPE SNI (FEARS NOTHING)‏
    My new Lakota name from the people!
    Hakikta Win

    Like

  3. Pingback: Stats going through the roof for Looking Back Womans WordPress blog!!! Jan 4, 2012!!! | Looking Back Woman-Suzanne Dupree blog (Edit)
  4. Pingback: Info people are reading on LBW WordPress blog…Jan 20, 2012 | Looking Back Woman-Suzanne Dupree blog (Edit)
  5. 0
    0
    Rate This

    Reblogged this on Looking Back Woman-Suzanne Dupree blog and commented:

    Corresponding Arlo Looking Cloud depositions showing the role of Mr Backrach who recently contacted me, asking in Lakota who I was, & in English asking what was my backround after he had been reading my blogs…and, this shows beyond any doubt that the Abourezks, had conflict of interest from Charles Abourezk being at AIMs Bill Means house the night before Graham executed Anna Mae Aquash…and, Charles Abourezk, the son of the Senator of South Dakota did not do anything to stop it from occuring to continue to hid AIMs crimes, & the fact that the Seige of Wounded Knee & other AIM events were stages & that AIMs handlers are the US Government who took AIM out of prison & set them upon Indian Country to keep US interests of Reservation lands & natural resource within the firm grip of the United States Government, which AIM works for…. beyond any doubt in my mind, how else could AIM have this type of political corruption of South Dakota representatives covered up for so long…and, out of the public domain or media, murder, murder, murder by AIM, who presented a threat to AIM & Government agenda, thats called a cover-up!!!

    Like

  6. 0
    0
    Rate This

    Feb. 2008, Barry Bachrach appointed, ALC expressed interest in co-operating with
    government, something previous attorneys had advised him against!
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Is this why you contacted me Barry, co-operating together, then who was there with you…who helped you with your question to me in Lakota, helped you spell it..
    I know for a fact you are not Lakota, & are not fluent in our Lakota language…who Lakota was there with you is what I want to know!
    Just because you hand over a few legal documents to James Simon, does not mean to me…you are a good guy, whos only desire is to right the wrongs of the past about the criminal & murderous activities of AIM.
    If that was the case, why have something so asinine as having posted on the net that Peltier endorsed you for Vice President, thats like Means endorsing Ron Paul, and the positive comments that was posted from that stinko move by Means supporters.
    Why would anyone want someone who is a murderer, to endorse them, any informed individual knows all the crooks know & support one another…this is just another example of what anyone with half a brain knows…

    Like

  7. Pingback: Arlo Looking Cloud shows conflict of interest by Rapid City Attorney & Supreme Court Judge of South Dakota, Charles Abourezk/AIM/Abourezk(s) Should All Be In Prison, Instead Of ArloLooking Cloud, great Job Exposing The Real AIM Serial Pedofile Raping (Edit)

Leave a Reply

:)

About Looking Back Woman-Suzanne Dupree

Tetuwan Lakota scholar, educator, historian, Sun Dance participant, Cannunpa carrier, cultural & spiritual preservationist, journalist-writer and fraud investigator.
This entry was posted in SPIRITUAL AWAKENING. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Arlo Looking Cloud should be free, conflict of interest collusion by legal council!

  1. Pingback: Arlo Looking Cloud should be free,[AND HE IS!!!] *Conflict of interest collusion by legal council Rensch, Ellison, Abourezk($) & Pirsol! | Looking Back Woman-Suzanne Dupree blog

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s